Hold Journalists to Their Political Ideology

Liberal journalists should give away their money to the state and let the state redistribute it back to them.
Journalists should disclose their political holdings just like financial analysts disclose their financial holdings.
Journalists should disclose who they voted for from the President all the way down to the local elections.
Journalists should be asked if they claim to be unbiased, non-partisan or without a political agenda.
Journalists should be held to the standard they claim.
Liberal journalists will NEVER live the way they advocate and demand everyone else live; and submit to the state.

There is a terrific disad, John Fitzgerald Kenn | Dictionary.com

Watch how the self-righteous press squirm, recoil and writhe with bitterness when the power of the press is turned on themselves; when the cleansing light of accountability is gloriously shined on the press itself--that is watching hypocrisy at its ugliest zenith.


"There is a terrific disadvantage in not having the abrasive quality of the press applied to you daily...Even though we never like it, and even though we wish they didn't write it, and even though we disapprove, there isn't any doubt that we could not do the job at all in a free society without a very, very active press." (John Fitzgerald Kennedy (1917–1963), U.S. Democratic politician, president. quoted in Theodore C. Sorensen, Kennedy, pt. 3, ch. 12 (1965).  


Ionmedia advocates a very, very active citizen press corps to scrutinize the press itself--to keep the press accountable; to assist the press in self-decontamination; to serve as an anti-corruptive agent striving to bring back a free society.  Emboldened by a dearth of transparency and accountability the press destroys liberty and freedom and the right to free speech.  A corrupt press will always seek to create an unnatural monopoly on free speech; to artificially create a scarcity of truth, perspective and information; especially a scarcity of self-revelatory information on bias, perspective and political agenda.  A corrupt press will claim impartiality and act partially.     

Tell The Truth

Tell The Truth

Liberal News Media Rats

Here is the list of names of the infamous liberal JournoList; liberals claiming to be unbiased journalists but in truth working to promote and further the liberal political agenda.  They cling to their hypocrisy that they are unbiased journalists and refuse to self-disclose their bias.

They colluded to use their supposedly unbiased profession to act covertly to elect a liberal president.  Liberal journalists have soiled their profession--liberal journalists are puppets for liberal politicians.  All the while mind you sticking to their claim that they do not promote a political agenda.  They are definitional hypocrites: advocating contrary to their own actions.  Every woman and man on this list is a liar.  Some are neo-marxists.

This is a great paragraph by Trevor Loudon: "JournoList was not just a bunch of “liberal’ journos with too much time on their hands.  It was a network of high level opinion makers, united by a “progressive” vision for America. They believed that their superior judgment and insight obligated them to present Americans with a view of reality that they would be too stupid and reactionary to grasp unaided.  At least a few, perhaps many, were committed Marxists who saw journalism, not as a profession, but as a revolutionary tool.  This disgraceful episode should dispel forever the “progressive” lie that the American MainStreamMedia and its “liberal” core, can be trusted to uphold the objective standards of their profession."


I challenge every woman and man on this list to disclose your political bias and disavow your claim you have no political bias. 

Leftwing Journalist Forever Discredited

Journolist has exposed and revealed itself as the partisan Leftwing Media it is, and will forever be discredited for what they are: leftwing activists claiming to be objective journalists. They are liars; they are not journalists; they are not objective. They have political motivations. They are leftists propagandists pure and simple.

Leftists media propagandists perpetrate two crimes endlessly on the American people:

1)Having a bias while claiming they don't have a bias. Possession of a bias is no crime. Dis-ingenuity, falsehoods, lies, occlusion, non-transparency, these are the crimes.

And why do leftist media types hide their bias? Because of the 2nd crime:

2)Leftist bias is anti-freedom. Leftism, socialism is antithetical to freedom and liberty. And the leftists know it and they know the responsible American people know it. And responsible, freedom and liberty loving people everywhere reject it.

That is why leftists hide their liberalism, their socialism desires; they they have to hide and act covertly; they fear to make a stand, to reveal who they really are what they really think, what they really want.

Leftists want to control. Leftists want to destroy freedom and liberty. Leftists want to force, coerce and command.

Proof of Collusion in the Liberal Media

Liberal media are liars and collude to protect and advance their political agenda. This would be fine if they did not claim that they were journalists. But they do claim to be journalists. This is the only credibility they have; to wear the sheep clothing. But they are not journalists, they are propagandists. They are wolves in sheep clothing. They pretend to be unbiased; they claim to portray the truth; in reality they serve the liberal agenda. They are not concerned about the truth they are interested in promoting liberalism. Yet they are afraid and scared to reveal who they really are, and what their true motives are and what their real agenda is--they are in fact cowards. They are amazingly afraid of revealing their true identity so they hide and cower behind the mask of journalist.

Political liberalism is weak and cowardly and tepid and enervating and they know it. That is why liberals journalists are deathly afraid to reveal who and what they are. Liberalism destroys individual liberty and personal freedom. It promotes the aggregation of power to ever smaller groups and special interests and pyramids of power; and then on to the dominant leaders of those small groups to an eventual one person leader--a tyrant; a dictator.

Political liberalism leads to and promotes totalitarianism; dictatorship, tyranny. Hollywood has yet to meet a dictator it didn't love. Speildberg, Penn, Coster, Stone and many many others adore Castro and Chavez. Castro and Chavez are dictators; murder dissidents and repress and steal freedom and liberty away from people. This is who the "mussolini media" love and adore.

ABC News Fabricates Visual Evidence

"It all points to problems that are created when visual journalists try to alter reality in order to get a better picture."

My Way News - 2-second video causes headache for ABC News

"National Press Corps Despicable" Claims Democrat

Watch CBS News Videos Online

Old Media Unwilling To Comply With Transparency Regulations It Seeks To Impose On Weblogs

This Forbes article shows that the old gate keepers of information--old media --are finding themselves blinded by the speed with which webloggers are capturing and dispersing information--by orders of magnitude faster.

Not surprisingly now, old media --the politically well connected old media--seek to combat the competition coming from webloggers for control of information by burdening us with regulations that old-media are unwilling to shoulder themselves.

We welcome the challenge. Without formal political connections and power we will still win the free speech and information war. Old media in no way or manner is ready to disclose their conflicts of interest and their political bias. Webloggers will have an easier time complying with transparency than old media ever would--if at all--and ever will.

We call for national broadcast journalists to disclose their political bias, their political view and make their journalistic views transparent by disclosing who they vote for. Demand that journalists and old-media disclose their political perspective.